Maoist dogma clashes with fair appraisal of science
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Subluxation: dogma or science?
Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and confusion within the chiropractic profession. We believe that an evidence-orientation among chiroprac...
متن کاملClashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion
By reading, you can know the knowledge and things more, not only about what you get from people to people. Book will be more trusted. As this clashes of knowledge orthodoxies and heterodoxies in science and religion reprint, it will really give you the good idea to be successful. It is not only for you to be success in certain life you can be successful in everything. The success can be started...
متن کاملScience Fair Resources
236 Editor’s Choice SB&F (Science Books & Films) Your Guide to Science Resources for All Ages is written for librarians, media specialists, curriculum supervisors, science teachers, and others responsible for recommending or purchasing science materials. SB&F provides critical reviews of the scientific accuracy and presentation of print, audiovisual, and electronic resources intended for use in...
متن کاملCollocational Clashes in the Persian Translations of Tuesdays with Morrie
This study aimed at finding features of collocational deviations in the translations of Tuesdays with Mor- rie. In this direction, categories of collocations and collocational clashes, as well as causes of collocation- al clashes were explored. The present work investigated five Persian translations of the novel. All the books were examined completely and all possible collocational clashes were...
متن کاملMartin-Löf Clashes With Griffin, Operationally
The computational reading of proofs in intutionistic predicate logic (IPL) as λ-terms can be extended in two well-known ways. On the one hand, Martin-Löf showed how the Axiom of Choice (AC) can be interpreted as a term of dependent type theory. On the other hand, Griffin showed how Peirce’s law (which generates classical logic from intuitionistic) can be interpreted as a program using control o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature
سال: 1980
ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/283810e0